This type of reader-response, specific feedback will be much more helpful to classmates. Note, also, the use of examples in the second version and how the examples help show the reader’s perspective and reasoning. You can’t go wrong if you express your response in terms that reflect your distinct reading and in a way that focuses on providing helpful feedback related to the assignment goals. One thing that helped me focus more on rhetorical analysis is using those terms “ethos,” “pathos,” and “logos.” What is the author’s ethos? How would you describe the logos – does the argument about coal mining seem logical? What about the emotional appeal (pathos)? Rhetorical analysis is totally new to me, and using these terms really helped! This may be an important part to work on when you revise since a main goal of this essay is to create a rhetorical analysis. Reader response: When I read the body of your essay, I was able to get a good idea of the main ideas of the article you are analyzing, but I was unclear about your analytical points. Note the difference:Ĭritical, command-style: You need to redo the whole body of the essay. As described on the page, a strategy that helps is using reader-response language rather than critical, command-style language. Your instructor wants to emphasize that students often feel anxious about offering feedback because of concerns of coming across as too critical or because of a lack of confidence about writing and reading skills. Click the following link to open this page in a new browser window: Peer-Review: A Few NotesĪs expressed on this page, any feedback you offer is valuable as long as it focuses on the assignment goals and reflects your response as a reader. You may also find it helpful to review the “Peer-Review: A Few Notes” page posted under the Course Materials module in the Content area. Be sure to read the instructions carefully to ensure you have a clear understanding of the purpose and value of peer-review and the process you will follow. Full instructions for peer-review are provided in the discussion prompt. You will post your rough draft to the CD2 topic under Discussions. The second part of this week will focus on peer-review. Here is an outline you can follow that will help you achieve these requirements: As you are aware, one of the goals is to ensure your essay has an introduction, a series of focused body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Likely, you will benefit from reviewing the readings from the past modules. Your next step will be to apply everything you’ve learned about rhetorical analysis to the drafting of your essay. You are completely welcome to continue using the text you focused on in the CD1bdiscussion. This is very important, as if you aren’t able to identify the author, audience, and argument, you will have a difficult time establishing a foundation for your analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |